|
Subject:
GBlist: ecoVillage opening in Virginia
Date: September 12
To: greenbuilding@crest.org, strawbale@crest.org
From: Linda Lloyd
Announcing the opening of The Quarries, a 750 acre
ecoVillage in Schuyler (Walton's Mtn), Virginia, 25 min
south of Charlottesville ----- www.thequarries.com ---
practicing the principles of responsible environmental
design, building and progressive community building ----
located on former quarry property in the soapstone
capital of the world - mostly wooded homesites with
southern exposures -- amenities include The Aviary
community building to be started soon (straw-bale),
common land with extenisve trail system including beaver
ponds and water filled quarries that are works of art and
great for swimming and fishing and contemplating -
covenants include sensitive siting and tree retention,
solar and energy efficiency and healthful building
materials -- in home occupations welcomed -- artist
live/work spaces and gallery spaces soon to be available
at nearby soapstone plant --custom site planning and
design services available -- 2 acre lots - to 50+ acres -
$20000 to $75000+ === Linda Lloyd
______________________________________________________________________
This greenbuilding dialogue is sponsored by CREST
<www.crest.org>
Environmental Building News <www.ebuild.com> and
Oikos <www.oikos.com>
For instructions send e-mail to
greenbuilding-request@crest.org.
______________________________________________________________________
Date: Mon. Aug 9 1999
From: undisclosed sender
To: undisclosed recipient
(personal portion snipped)
...By the way, this is the first time
that our architect has ever heard of a masonry heater and
she found your site very helpful, as well as the Masonry
Heater Home page...
(client in Ohio)
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 23:20:27
From: Jerry Frisch <frischro@premier1.net>
To: Bev Marois <bmarois@sover.net>
CC: nehearth@bigfoot.com,
staywarm@tempcast.com, mheat@mha-net.org
Subject: Seismic news
Hello Bev,
The seismic issue is final at this
point as far as I can see. The
report on five different sizes and shapes of heaters were
analyzed and
they all passed without steel. Bulk weight - dead load,
(gravity will
prevent tip over). However, the engineer who did the
calculations
suggest four 1/4" rods with a 1/4" flat plate
at top and post tension
applied would be recommended, JUST BECAUSE!!!
So I guess we have something to work
with as opposed to grout. Also,on the code, I will go to
LA for a hearing on Sunday, March 21st and on Friday,
March 26th. Then I go on to the HPA show at Phoenix,
March 27th & 28th. Will let you know what happens at
both.
Jerry Frisch
Lopez Quarries Masonry Heaters
Firecrest Fireplaces Corp.
111 Barbara Lane, Everett, WA 98203
Phone: 425 353-8963 Fax: 425 742-3361
Web site: www.firecrest-fireplaces.com
Date: Wednesday, February 10,
1999 3:30 PM
From: John Meeker
<jmlk@TAPnet.net>
To: aer <info@aer-online.com>
Cc: EPA
<bmccrillis@engineer.aeerl.epa.gov>; mha
<bmarois@sover.net>
Subject: Residential Wood Combustion Technology
Review
I want to thank Alternative Energy Retailer for
publishing notice of this EPA report, Bob McCrillis for
putting me on to the download link
http://mha-net.org/docs/rwc01.PDF and the Masonry Heater
Association for posting the report.
I think any one who reads this report will be impressed
with the sorry state of RWCT. "We don t have enough
data to know the answer", "We can t afford to
change anything because sales are so small", and
"We can t get involved with the International
Standards Organization (ISO) because of the large
investment in Method 28 and the low sales volume"
are typical of the answers given by experts, most of whom
have not been close to anything new in wood burning in
years. A lengthy literature list has very few citations
dated after 1990.
We in this country like to think of ourselves as the
technology leaders of the world and the premier example
of the free enterprise system. I believe that the EPA
should put out an RFQ for 15,000 (5000 for us, 5000 for
Europe and 5000 for the rest of the world) battery
operated stack samplers to cost less than $300 each.
These could, for example, use the mass production
experience of in home CO monitors, motion detectors to
measure smoke density and digital recording from the
answering machine manufacturers. Stack temperature could
be used to turn the recording off when the appliance is
not in use and provide good data on startup versus steady
state pollution.
These devices could be given to qualified installers and
sweeps who have the ability to download the data and
email it to the EPA. They should be paid something like
$300 for each valid 30 day report they submit. An
optional on site readout should be available for the
environmentally/cost conscious consumer who wants to
purchase the system (from a dealer, not the EPA) to
monitor his performance. The scope of this program should
include all fuels, not just wood.
It should not take long to establish a data base from
which to establish perhaps three categories ---Excellent,
Good and No Good. New product could be allowed to come to
market based on one season of data from six sights
located around the country. Enforcement could be the
threat of recall if random sampling indicates the claims
to be false. The EPA could even offer a bonus for reports
on product that is suspect. Local authorities could use
the testing to shut down known polluters. Dealers could
use the testing to sell maintenance and upgrading and the
EPA could glory in the progress being made and gradually
tighten the standards. Wouldn t this be better than
continuing Method 28 testing for another ten years?
John "Offgrid" Meeker jmlk@tapnet.net
Date: December 5, 1998
To: mheat@mha-net.org
From: Jerry Alonzy
Subject: Your site has been mentioned in The
Natural Handyman Newsletter
Based on the recommendation of one of
our readers, we have mentioned your website in our
December Newsletter, which is due to be sent out over the
next few days.
Though the topic at hand was masonry
ovens (arising from a question in our November
Newsletter), your site is so interesting and informative
that we have also added it as both a masonry link and a
heating link in our Links Library.
As an aside, I was a five-to-seven cord
a year man myself in the seventies and eighties. Your
masonry heating system sounds like a wonderful concept,
especially if the home builder designs the home around
the heater as the "soul" of the home.
Unfortunately, due to inefficient design, most homes
struggle with wood heat efficiency and distribution
unless the source is a multifuel furnace.
In our latest newsletter (December), we
feature a book by Susan Susanka called "The Not So
Big House". Your heating concept and her
architectural concepts are a good match for modern and
sensible living.
If you have a moment, please visit our
site, The Natural Handyman. We
involve ourselves in small home repair information
primarily, though we
also touch on some appliance and minor construction
issues. If you think
it would be suitable, a link back to us from your
directory would be
appreciated.
Thank you,
Jerry Alonzy
Webmaster
The Natural Handyman
http://www.naturalhandyman.com/newsltr/newsltr.htm
Date: November 28, 1998
To: mheat@mha-net.org
From: Michelle Mahood mmahood@shasta.com
Subject: Straw Bale House
>Hi, surfed onto your site with interest. I just
finished a straw bale
>900 sq ft house in northern california, 3000'
elevation. I've rice
>straw bales laid on edge with plaster (not stucco)
inside and out. I
>put it a Quadra Fire propane fireview stove (since
everything else is
>propane) and it does the wintry job so well I barely
get to ever see the
>pretty flames. I.E., although thermostat's set to be
at 60 while I'm
>gone, I get home and it's still at 65-68 inside.
I.E., the stove hasn't
>come on all day. I love it. The house is so efficient
you could heat
>it by turning on the lights. My clever neighbor built
a masonry stove,
>however, and it's the focal point of the house and
very lovely; he burns
>only a cord or so a year.
>
>- Michelle
Michelle:
Thanks for the note. You make a very interesting point
that I have a hard time getting across to clients who are
about to build an efficient house but have never
experienced one -- namely, that you don't need a high
output heating system and it is entirely optional whether
you spend big dollars on radiant flooring, heat pumps,
etc.
A masonry heater is an excellent solution if you want to
burn wood, because it can match the low heat load of the
house, and can double as a fireplace, hence justifying
some of its expense. In your case, even though you burn
propane, the impact is much less because the house is
very efficient, which is the key.
Would you mind if I quote your comments?
Best.......Norbert Senf
Date: September
29, 1998:
Interesting email
discussion about global warming
between Eric Lawton (a senior policy advisor to the
Ontario government), John Gulland, and Norbert Senf
Date: Jeu, 24 Sep 98 13:34:13
-0000
To: "MHA" mheat@mha-net.org
From: "d'Ornano"
<ateliers.boucaou@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: bakeoven in southwest of France
Dear Sir,
I am also in the bakeoven trade. I am building masonery
oven upon the traditional design of Gasogne region
(southwest of France, south of Bordeaux). I am also
organizing training workshops.
My URL is listed below. The page about
ovens is :
http://pro.wanadoo/ateliers.boucaou/four.htm
some image also in
http://pro.wanadoo/ateliers.boucaou/chantier.htm
I am quit keen of your website. Do you contact with other
ovenbuilders in France ? Would you be interest in an
exchange of links ?
Sincerely
Date: Tuesday, September
08, 1998
To: MHA Administrator
From: Karen J. Davison
Subject: Joining the association
I am a Master's student in the
Industrial Design Department, Faculty of Environmental
Design, at the University of Calgary. I am very
interested in joining your association as I am doing my
thesis project on masonry heaters as appropriate
technology. Can you please tell me if there might
be a reduction in membership fees while I am still a
student? Thank You.
Yours truly,
Karen J. Davison
Date: Thursday, August
20, 1998
To: MHA Administrator
From: Helen & John Donlan
Subject: MHA Annual Meeting
Thank you so much for
responding so quickly. We are both very excited
about the Masonry Heaters Association and the Annual
Meeting. Please do send some information to us as
you have it! We are already making plans to be
there!
We are getting ready to construct our
first masonry heater. We are looking for
information specifically related to incorporating a bake
oven on the first floor with the fire box in the
basement. Is this possible? I can visualize
it, but we don't know if it will work or not. We
have had trouble getting much information until I bought
this computer and got on the internet. Your Web
page and library are life savers.
Again, thank you and we look forward to
hearing from you soon!
Sincerely,
John and Helen Donlan
Date:
Saturday, June 13, 1998
To: MHA Administrator
From: Rob Deglau
Subject: Straw Bale Housing
I was very impressed
with your site. I have taken the liberty to include
you site as link for our site. The SIM housing
network deals with inner city housing issues and one of
our solutions to building affordable housing is
researching straw bale construction. It is our goal to
eventually build straw bale housing in an urban
environment.
Regards,
Rob Deglau
Regina, Saskatchewan
Canada
Date: Monday, July 13,
1998
To: MHA Administrator
From: William O'Donnell
Subject: My beloved masonry heater
Just read Steve Bushway's excellent
insights into getting a masonry
heater up to temp. most efficiently. I remember reading
some time ago
that softwood, such as white pine, is often more
effective in getting
the heater up to temp. than slower burning hardwood. Is
softwood OK to use or should I stay with finely split
hardwood as suggested by Steve? I guess my concern is not
as much over performance but with
creosote/pollution, etc. Any thoughts? Love your
website-- a huge
resource.
Thanks,
Bill O'Donnell
Date: Tuesday, March 13,
1998
To: MHA Administrator
From: Paul B. Stegmeir
Subject: MHA
Please send me info on your
organization, and a list of your member
companies. I am trying to promote a broader acceptance of
masonry
heaters in our area. I have many contacts with builders,
designers and
architects.
Thanks...Paul
Paul B. Stegmeir
Consultant, Lecturer, Writer
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 1998
To: mheat@mha-net.org
From: Charles Hockensmith
Subject: small oven
Hello! Just found your web page. It was
a bit hard to find information on y'all but I persevered
so here goes. I'm a 4 5 year old mason been in the trade
25 years of my life went back to school got an associates
degree in architecture, wasn't suited with that so I
tested to see if I had enough gumption to go to the
university to study architecture for a B.A.and now I am
in school. So that's what brings me here. You see,the
dean caught wind that I was some kind of wiz bang mason
so he had me come over to his 1850 brick abode to have a
look at the fireplace. Well it turns out that the wall is
only 18" thick and the fireplace is bricked up, I
can fix that part but, he also wanted a brick bake oven
built in at eye level or so. I in my infinite wisdom have
always thought that if you throw enough money at any
project you can make it work and with that in mind, I
gave him an emphatic encouragement that it would work! So
I'm presently doing research on the subject writing this
letter to y'all in hopes that some design can be worked
out as I have one in mind but am not sure about all the
details.
Also,when and where are you going to
meet this year for the masonry heater association this
year I may just come.
Charles Hockensmith
May 12: Feedback from
Bill Derrick about bakeovens
  |
Navigation
buttons |
The Ontario government on Global Warming
The Ontario
government on Global Warming
Letter to John Gulland from Senior Policy
Advisor, National Climate Change Secretariat
From: Eric Lawton [mailto:lawtoner@ene.gov.on.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 1998 10:05 AM
To: host@wood-heat.com
Subject: the "real" real world of Global
Warming
JD:
Your desire to promote the benefits of wood heating is
commendable, but there is an error in your statement on
global warming on your website. You say that
"Governments
are taking no action, not even the beginnings of the
public
discussion needed to form a social consensus on ways to
proceed."
The truth is that 14 "Issues Tables" have been
formed by the
federal, provincial and territorial governments under an
18-month long National Climate Change Process to provide
expert and detailed input to help Canada and the
Provinces
identify and analyze greenhouse gas reduction
opportunities. The Tables, each with a particular
issue or
sector focus, are managed by the National Climate Change
Secretariat, which is co-chaired by David Oulton (Natural
Resources Canada) and John Donner (Alberta Energy) and
staffed by federal and provincial government employees.
The
tables are analyzing opportunities in the following
areas,
o agriculture
and agri-food
o analysis and
modelling
o buildings
o credit for
early action
o electricity
o enhanced
voluntary action
o forestry
o industry
o international
flexibility mechanisms
o
municipalities
o public
education and outreach
o sinks (carbon
sequestration)
o technology
o
transportation
Table members have been both invited and self-selected
from
government, industry, environmental non-governmental
organizations, academia, municipalities and other
representatives. The tables typically have 20-30 members.
In total, more than 400 people are involved directly on
the
Issues Tables and another 500 or so as "Tier 2"
members who
contribute to the table discussions electronically but
don't
attend Issue Table meetings. One of the main
objectives of
the process is to educate Canadians about climate change
and
to engage them in the debate over what to do to achieve
Canada's Kyoto target.
For more information contact the National Climate Change
Secretariat, 55 Murray Street, Suite 600, Ottawa,
Ontario,
K1N 5M3, ph. (613) 943 2678, fax (613) 943 2695,
website
http://www.nccp.ca
Regards,
Eric Lawton
National Climate Change Secretariat/
Sr. Policy Advisor,
Ontario Ministry of Energy, Science and Technology
tel (416) 325-6852
fax (416) 325-7023
email: lawtoner@est.gov.on.ca
Reply to Eric Lawton from John Gulland
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 15:18:20 -0400
Eric,
Thanks for writing to rattle my chain about content on
the wood-heat.com web site. I have been meaning to
either update or delete the article you mentioned because
it was too strongly worded to begin with for this kind of
site and events have made it somewhat dated since it was
put on the site two years ago. I have now deleted it and
when I have time I'll write a more current treatment of
the greenhouse gas/global warming/climate change issue.
That said, considering the scale of the problem and
the lag times involved after policy decisions are finally
made and the potential for environmental overshoot into
unknown territory over the next 20 years, I would suggest
that the National Climate Change Process is rather late
and feeble; after all, Canada signed on to begin dealing
with the issue in 1992. Yes, I can be challenged
for saying in the article that governments have taken no
action, but the action taken, including the laughable
"voluntary controls", have not yielded much,
except perhaps having afforded the fossil fuel industry
lobbyists good opportunities to hone their arguments
against any action at all.
What conclusions should I draw when Alberta's premier
issues threats against any federal action on climate
change by saying that it better not have any effect on
the oil patch? Should I be encouraged when you
point out that John Donner of Alberta Energy is a
co-chair of the climate change secretariat; this
considering that his department until recently (and
perhaps still does) dispute the existence of global
warming?
No, despite your assurances that
"opportunities" for greenhouse gas reduction
are being sought, I am not reassured. I agree that
it is useful for governments to combine their efforts to
look for solutions, but such an exercise can be an
effective way to do nothing while being seen to do
something. I think a better gauge of the level of
government commitment to the problem are the gutted and
demoralized environment departments that exist in the
national and each provincial capital.
We still have bargain basement pricing on fossil fuels
and until that changes, the economy will continue to
consume them like there is no tomorrow, literally. There
are insufficient price signals in the economy to
encourage conservation or efficiency improvements or
energy source switching. Note that fuel mileage is
absent as a selling feature of new cars, vans and sport
utilities, and that solar and wind energy are still
considered too "expensive". Note also
that when elected leaders (including Mike Harris) express
themselves about energy pricing, it is most often to fume
about unfairly high gasoline prices (it still costs less
than Coke) or to give assurances that hydro prices will
stay low. What prospects are there for meaningful
greenhouse gas emission reductions as long as the cheap
fossil fuel binge continues and governments and the
economy send out entirely the wrong signals?
I am cynical because so much of the economic and
political power in Canada lies with people and industries
with a vested interest in the status quo. And I am
also hopelessly optimistic or I wouldn't bother writing
back to you or maintain a web site like wood-heat.com.
I will make you a bet right here and now: I'll
bet you that after all the talk, dithering, and fighting
over what to do is done, the only solution that will
emerge as viable is some form of green tax shifting in
which taxes on fossil fuels (and other environmental
pollutants) are increased and taxes on labour are reduced
by a like amount, and I'll bet you further that by the
time any form of consensus is found on that issue,
world-wide shortages of fossil fuels will cause their
prices to spike upward, triggering another energy
crisis. I think there will be reductions in
greenhouse gas emissions alright, but they will come much
too late to prevent a very messy situation.
Thanks again for writing. Good luck in your work
with the Climate Change Secretariat; you'll probably need
it, we all will.
Regards,
John
This is for business: http://www.gulland.ca/
This is for pleasure: http://www.wood-heat.com/
Reply to Eric Lawton from Norbert Senf
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998
Dear Mr. Lawton:
I would like to express my support for John Gulland's
statements in his reply to your critique of his global
warming article. I would suggest that all John has to do
to update his article is change the words
"governments have taken no action" to
"there have been no results from federal or Ontario
government actions."
While the elaborate consultation scheme that you describe
sounds interesting, I would suggest that your first
hurdle is to establish your own credibility, considering
the Ontario and federal governments' track record on the
environment. A cynic might suggest that this is a smoke
screen to mask a lack of leadership, even fundamental
comprehension, of the issue.
John's pointers to the tax shifting concept is right on
target. The "no brainer" in this debate is a
carbon tax, and the fact that it is not front and centre
in your discussion undermines your credibility and
suggests an ignorance of the fundamentals. When Anne
MacLellan was recently minister at Natural Resources
Canada, she would not even allow this issue to be put on
the table, at the behest of her Alberta oil patch pals.
Except for our American neighbours, the rest of the
industrialized world takes a carbon tax as a given.
I would issue you the following challenge:
- provide documented evidence of ANY greenhouse gas
reductions directly attributable to Ontario government
legislation or regulatory initiative.
Get serious, please, and demonstrate some leadership.
Global warming will not be reversed via media spin!
Yours truly,
Norbert Senf
Reply from Eric Lawton to Norbert Senf
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 16:16:52 -0400
Dear Mr. Senf:
You've touched on a lot of issues in your message.
There
appears to be a gulf between where you want the Ontario
Government and/or Federal Government to be and where you
think they are now. It reminds me that there is a
lot of work to be
done to inform people about where we are and what's going
on. I
know I'm right in the thick of the process and there's so
much
going on it's hard to keep up.
You also have to remember that I'm not a decision-maker
for the
Ontario government. I do my best to provide advice
and
information as input to that decision-making
process. I'm not
passing the buck by saying this. It's the reality
of heirarchical
organizations. You only have to look at the
Ministry's Business
Plan to see who our leader is.
I was simply trying to clear up a misconception in John
Gullard's
website by informing him about the National Climate
Change
Process. I hoped that this would encourage him to
look to the
NCCP website over the next several months as the analysis
is
developed. There's a lot of people working hard to
figure out how
Canada can get from "here" to
"there".
I like a recent comment by Greater Vancouver Regional
District
Director Gordon Price, who said,
"The world apparently has the flu, but it's not
clear how sick we're
going to get. Consequently, we're not in the mood
for strong
medicine - at least not yet."
It's a given that drug companies spend a lot of money
doing
research and trials before they're ready to market.
I think
government policies are somewhat similar. A whole
lot of people
and companies must work together to deal with the climate
change problem. You don't just down the hard stuff
before you
know what it's going to do to you. I would agree
with Price that
the National Process is populated by people who are
"[not]
tolerant of extremes, junk science, weak data or
well-intentioned
policies with unintended consequences."
Personally, I'm glad
about that.
Price is accurate, in my view, in saying that
"Having committed
itself to the terms of the Kyoto agreement, the feds want
to know
what it would take to reduce greenhouse gases by six
percent
over 1990 levels by around 2010."
(EL: The provinces and industry want to know, too, and
the
Canadian public needs to be informed so changes have a
chance
of happening.)
Price: "That is a very ambitious goal, and
they fear it could come
at a high political cost. Wrenching change,
inequitably shared,
with no assured or even visible results is not the sort
of thing
politicians put high on their agendas. But without
action, it's
estimated that carbon emissions from developed countries
will rise
by some 25 percent from 1990 levels by 2010.
So, they consult. Like the saying goes: If you want
to stall
something into the ground, hand it over to an action
committee."
I disagree with the last sentence. I don't think
it's a fair
assessment of the reason for the National Process.
It's also an
insult to the many intelligent, socially- and
environmentally-conscious, determined people who are
working
overtime to come up with fully-reasoned ideas on how to
proceed.
I haven't seen any evidence that the National Process was
set up to forestall action on the issue. The fact
is that there are a lot of
questions that need answers to make progress towards the
goal.
I have to get back at it now, but I'll direct you to the
MOE website
(www.ene.gov.on.ca) for more information about climate
change
activities in Ontario. Look under Programs and
Initiatives - Climate
Change for Publication #3611 (Ontario's 1997 VCR Action
Plan)
and #338701 (Meeting the Challenge of Climate
Change).
Regards,
Eric Lawton
Ministry of Energy, Science and Technology
Reply from Norbert Senf to Eric Lawton
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998
Dear Mr. Lawton:
Thank you for your considered reply. I will indeed check
out your website to see if any of the discussions relate
to my own areas of research on this issue.
Forgive me for not having much faith in this process. I
am simply going by the government's track record on its
Rio committments, and am waiting to see some concrete
results before shifting my own attention. I recently
reviewed some pamphlets from Environment Canada, and they
made my stomach turn with their PR flack and lack of
substance. As I mentioned, the words "carbon
tax" and "tax shift" would indicate to me
that the government's policy advisors are not living in a
parallel universe from mine (and many other researchers).
For your information, attached below is another email
from today that you may find of interest.
Best............Norbert Senf
--------message separator-------------
From: Worldwatch Institute <ww@worldwatch.org>
To: "'mheat@mha-net.org'"
<mheat@mha-net.org>
Subject: Online discussion invitation
ONLINE SEMINAR INVITATION
(please post and circulate; apologies for cross-postings
and
duplicate mailings)
----------------------
We are pleased to invite you to join an online discussion
about one
of the most powerful ideas for building an
environmentally
sustainable economy. The Worldwatch Institute has just
released The
Natural Wealth of Nations: Harnessing the Market for the
Environment. You can join the author in global, on-line
discussion
starting soon--October 15-22. Participants can also buy
the book at a discount.
----------------------
"...a must-have guidebook to the policies and
politics for putting
markets to work to protect our world instead of
destroying it."
-- Lester Brown, President, Worldwatch Institute
"Building on years of research at the Worldwatch
Institute, and his
own insight, David Roodman carefully develops some of the
ecological
economic policies needed to economize on and develop The
Natural
Wealth of Nations."
-- Herman Daly, ecological economist, University of
Maryland
----------------------
THE BOOK
In The Natural Wealth of Nations, Worldwatch Institute
Senior
Researcher David Roodman calls on governments to
fundamentally
reorient how they raise and spend money in order to
protect the
environment. The proposals are common sense--but
politically
explosive.
First, he argues, governments need to drastically reduce
the $650
billion in obsolete subsidies for environmentally
destructive
activities like clearcutting and driving--which could pay
for a
tax cut of roughly $2,000 for every family of four in the
industrial
nations such as the United States, Japan, and Germany.
Of course governments offer most of these subsidies with
the best of
intentions--stimulating development, protecting jobs,
aiding the
poor. But almost all, Roodman asserts, are obsolete,
ineffective,
grossly inefficient, or self-defeating. To keep old coal
mines
competitive and preserve jobs, he points out, Germany
spends $86,000
per miner each year in subsidies. It would be cheaper now
to shut
down the mines and pay miners not to work.
Second, the book argues that governments need to shift an
additional
$1.5 trillion a year in taxes, by increasing levies on
pollution and
resource use, and putting the money toward cutting taxes
on work and
investment.
Roodman says, "Unless we stop subsidizing
environmental harm and
start taxing it, we will never build an environmentally
sound
economy.... Solving problems like global
warming--slashing fossil
fuel use--will take changes in where we live, how we move
about, and
how we make everything from bottles to buildings. No
government can
plan all that. Only if we make prices tell the ecological
truth can
we harness the power of the market for the
environment."
----------------------
PLEASE JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Join David and other distinguished guests starting
October 15-22 for a
thoughtful discussion--conducted by e-mail--of David's
new book and
other issues of critical importance to the environment.
----------------------
As a special offer for participants only, you can buy The
Natural
Wealth of Nations at 20 percent off the regular price.
Act soon to leave time for processing and shipping of
your order.
To join the discussion and order the book, visit
http://csf.colorado.edu/sustainable-economics/natural-wealth.html.
----------------------
To read more about The Natural Wealth of Nations, go to
http://www.worldwatch.org/alerts/pr980912.html.
----------------------
To learn more about Communications for a Sustainable
Future and the
Worldwatch Institute (the event's sponsors), visit
http://csf.colorado.edu and http://www.worldwatch.org.
----------------------
Questions? E-mail hinrichs@csf.colorado.edu.
----------------------
|
Letters Archive